25:1KJV Now when Festus was come into the province, after three days he ascended from Caesarea to Jerusalem.
B:E Project Festus, the new Roman governor, arrived in the province and three days later travelled up from Caesarea to Jerusalem.
Context: This opens the fourth act of Paul's long legal saga - a new governor takes over after Felix, restarting the political manoeuvring around Paul's imprisonment.
Meaning: Roman governors moved quickly to establish control, and visiting Jerusalem first signalled to local leaders that Festus meant to take their concerns seriously. This administrative detail sets up the collision that follows - old grievances against Paul are still very much alive under new management.
Lesson: New leadership doesn't erase old unfinished business - the same courage and integrity Paul needed under Felix he needs again under Festus. Don't assume a change of circumstance means your character is off the hook; stay ready.
See Also: 24:27 (Felix leaves Paul bound as a favour to the Jews, setting up this handover); 23:23-24 (Paul's transfer to Caesarea began the process now reaching its next stage).
25:2KJV Then the high priest and the chief of the Jews informed him against Paul, and besought him,
B:E Project The high priest and the leading Jews immediately brought their case against Paul to Festus and pleaded with him.
Context: The Jewish leadership loses no time exploiting the change of governor to renew their two-year-old campaign against Paul.
Meaning: This shows how personal grudges can outlast changes in circumstance and how quickly people will seize a new opportunity to pursue an old vendetta. Their urgency reveals this was never really about justice, but about eliminating someone they saw as a threat.
Lesson: Watch what happens in you when someone new arrives and you feel a fresh chance to press an old grievance - Jesus asks you to notice that impulse and let it go rather than feed it. Real peace comes from releasing old fights, not restarting them with new allies.
See Also: 24:1 (the original accusation, brought before Felix by the same group); 25:15 (Festus later recaps this same meeting to Agrippa).
25:3KJV And desired favour against him, that he would send for him to Jerusalem, laying wait in the way to kill him.
B:E Project They asked Festus for a favour - to have Paul brought to Jerusalem - while secretly planning to ambush and kill him on the road.
Context: This repeats the assassination plot from chapter 23, showing the same murderous intent survives two years and a change of governor.
Meaning: The request sounds like a reasonable legal favour but conceals a plan for cold-blooded murder - a reminder that requests can be weaponised when the real motive is hidden. Luke wants readers to see the gap between the polite language of officialdom and the violence underneath.
Lesson: Jesus warns that evil rarely announces itself plainly - it often comes dressed as a "reasonable request". Learn to notice when someone's stated ask doesn't match the energy or history behind it, and don't be pressured by politeness into ignoring danger.
See Also: 23:12-15 (the original ambush plot by more than forty men); Psalm 37:32 (the wicked watch the righteous and seek to slay him).
25:4KJV But Festus answered, that Paul should be kept at Caesarea, and that he himself would depart shortly thither.
B:E Project But Festus replied that Paul would stay in Caesarea, and that he himself would be returning there shortly.
Context: Festus's first act as governor unknowingly foils the assassination plot by refusing to move Paul.
Meaning: Whether by good judgement, Roman procedural instinct, or simple providence, Festus's decision keeps Paul safe without anyone realising a murder plot has just been quietly defeated. It's a small administrative choice with life-or-death consequences.
Lesson: You don't always see the danger you were protected from - Jesus wants you to trust that ordinary, unglamorous decisions (following proper process, not rushing) can be exactly how protection arrives. Don't dismiss the value of patience and due process.
See Also: 25:20-21 (Festus continues to keep Paul in Roman custody rather than hand him over); Proverbs 21:1 (the king's heart is in the Lord's hand).
25:5KJV Let them therefore, said he, which among you are able, go down with me, and accuse this man, if there be any wickedness in him.
B:E Project "So," he said, "let your leading men come down with me, and if this man has done anything wrong, let them make the accusation there."
Context: Festus insists on proper Roman legal procedure - the accusers must travel to where the accused is held, not the reverse.
Meaning: Festus is establishing a fair process: face-to-face accusation in the proper jurisdiction, not a secret trial arranged on someone else's terms. This procedural fairness, even from a non-believing Roman official, ends up protecting Paul.
Lesson: Fair process matters, even when handled by people who don't share your faith or values - Jesus doesn't ask you to distrust every system, but to recognise and be grateful for genuine fairness wherever it appears. Justice done properly protects everyone, including you.
See Also: 25:16 (Festus states this principle explicitly - Romans don't condemn without letting the accused answer face to face).
25:6KJV And when he had tarried among them more than ten days, he went down unto Caesarea; and the next day siting on the judgment seat commanded Paul to be brought.
B:E Project After spending more than ten days in Jerusalem, Festus went down to Caesarea, and the next day took his seat on the judgement bench and ordered Paul to be brought in.
Context: The formal Roman hearing begins - the third such hearing Paul has faced since his arrest, following those before the Sanhedrin and before Felix.
Meaning: The repetition of legal process - which by now Paul has endured many times - shows both the slow grinding of Roman bureaucracy and Paul's remarkable endurance under it. Nothing here is rushed; everything is procedurally correct, and yet still takes years.
Lesson: Endurance matters as much as any single dramatic moment - Jesus commends the quiet stamina of showing up, again and again, to face the same trial without losing hope or integrity. Long ordeals are still worth enduring well.
See Also: 24:1-9 (the earlier hearing before Felix, following the same pattern); Luke 21:12-15 (Jesus warns disciples they will be brought before rulers, and promises wisdom to answer).
25:7KJV And when he was come, the Jews which came down from Jerusalem stood round about, and laid many and grievous complaints against Paul, which they could not prove.
B:E Project When Paul arrived, the Jews who had come from Jerusalem surrounded him, throwing out many serious accusations which they were unable to prove.
Context: This is the actual hearing, echoing the pattern from Paul's trial before Felix - loud accusation without solid evidence.
Meaning: The scene has the tension of a courtroom drama: numerous grave charges are hurled, but under scrutiny none of them hold up. It shows how volume and aggression are no substitute for actual proof - a pattern Luke highlights repeatedly in Paul's trials.
Lesson: Jesus reminds you that being loudly accused doesn't make you guilty, and being surrounded by hostility doesn't mean you're wrong - character is proven over time, not by who shouts loudest in the moment. Stand steady when truth is on your side.
See Also: 24:5-6 (similar unproven accusations before Felix); Matthew 26:59-60 (false witnesses against Jesus also could not agree or prove their charges).
25:8KJV While he answered for himself, Neither against the law of the Jews, neither against the temple, nor yet against Caesar, have I offended any thing at all.
B:E Project Paul defended himself, saying, "I have done nothing wrong against Jewish law, against the Temple, or against Caesar."
Context: Paul's defence is simple and consistent across every hearing - a direct three-part denial covering Jewish religious law, Jewish worship, and Roman authority.
Meaning: Paul structures his defence around the three possible jurisdictions that could convict him, and calmly states he's broken none of their rules. His consistency across multiple trials, without contradiction, is itself powerful evidence of his innocence.
Lesson: Integrity means your story doesn't change depending on who's asking or what's convenient - Jesus values a life so consistent that the same simple truth holds up under repeated pressure. Live so that you never need a different account for different audiences.
See Also: 24:12-13 (Paul makes essentially the same three-part denial before Felix); 23:1 (Paul's claim to have lived with a clear conscience before God).
25:9KJV But Festus, willing to do the Jews a pleasure, answered Paul, and said, Wilt thou go up to Jerusalem, and there be judged of these things before me?
B:E Project But Festus, wanting to win favour with the Jewish leaders, asked Paul, "Are you willing to go up to Jerusalem and be tried before me there on these charges?"
Context: Despite having just insisted on proper procedure, Festus now compromises it for political convenience - the seed of the very danger Paul was protected from in verse 4.
Meaning: Even a fair-minded official can bend under political pressure, showing how easily justice gets traded for popularity. Paul senses the danger immediately, since moving to Jerusalem is exactly what the assassins wanted.
Lesson: Jesus warns against people-pleasing that quietly compromises what's right - watch for the moment you're tempted to bend a good decision just to keep someone happy. Courage sometimes means declining an offer dressed up as reasonable.
See Also: 25:3 (the ambush plot this proposal would have walked Paul straight into); Galatians 1:10 (Paul himself later writes that pleasing men and serving Christ are incompatible).
25:10KJV Then said Paul, I stand at Caesar’s judgment seat, where I ought to be judged: to the Jews have I done no wrong, as thou very well knowest.
B:E Project Paul replied, "I am standing before Caesar's own court, which is where I ought to be tried. I have done the Jews no wrong, as you very well know."
Context: Paul refuses the trap, asserting his rightful place in the Roman legal system rather than being manoeuvred back into a Jewish jurisdiction where he'd be unsafe.
Meaning: Paul knows his rights and uses them wisely - he's not being evasive, he's insisting on the legitimate court he's already standing in. His closing line ("as you very well know") is a pointed reminder that Festus already recognises his innocence.
Lesson: Jesus commends knowing your own situation clearly enough to say no to pressure, even from authority - self-respect and wisdom aren't opposed to humility. Standing your ground on truth, calmly and without hostility, is itself a form of faithfulness.
See Also: 22:25-29 (Paul's Roman citizenship and its legal protections, established earlier); 16:37 (Paul similarly insists on his citizen's rights in Philippi).
25:11KJV For if I be an offender, or have committed any thing worthy of death, I refuse not to die: but if there be none of these things whereof these accuse me, no man may deliver me unto them. I appeal unto Caesar.
B:E Project "If I have done wrong and deserve to die, I'm not trying to escape death. But if none of their accusations are true, no one has the right to hand me over to them. I appeal to Caesar."
Context: This is the pivotal legal turning point of the whole book - Paul's formal appeal to the emperor, which will determine the entire remaining narrative (his journey to Rome).
Meaning: Paul isn't afraid of a just death, but he refuses an unjust handover, and so exercises the ultimate right of a Roman citizen - a direct appeal to Caesar, bypassing all lower courts. This single sentence sets the direction for the rest of Acts.
Lesson: Jesus shows here that courage isn't the absence of fear about death, but the presence of trust that truth and justice matter more than self-preservation - and also that using legitimate means to protect yourself from injustice is wise, not cowardly. Fearlessness and shrewdness can coexist.
See Also: 9:15-16 (Jesus's own prophecy that Paul would bear his name before kings, now literally coming true); 27:24 (an angel later tells Paul he must stand before Caesar, confirming this path is part of a larger plan).
25:12KJV Then Festus, when he had conferred with the council, answered, Hast thou appealed unto Caesar? unto Caesar shalt thou go.
B:E Project After conferring with his advisory council, Festus declared, "You have appealed to Caesar - to Caesar you will go."
Context: The legal matter is settled; Festus formally grants the appeal, closing this stage of Paul's trials and opening the journey to Rome that will occupy the rest of Acts.
Meaning: A simple administrative ruling becomes the hinge of the whole book - from here, everything moves towards Rome, fulfilling what Jesus told Paul back in chapter 9 and what Jesus told the disciples in 1:8 about reaching "the uttermost part of the earth."
Lesson: Jesus works through ordinary bureaucratic decisions as much as through dramatic visions - notice how doors open through unremarkable process, not just dramatic intervention. Trust the path even when it looks procedural rather than miraculous.
See Also: 1:8 (Jesus's promise the gospel will reach "the uttermost part of the earth", of which Rome is the natural next horizon); 19:21 (Paul had already resolved in his spirit that he must see Rome).
25:13KJV And after certain days king Agrippa and Bernice came unto Caesarea to salute Festus.
B:E Project Some days later, King Agrippa and Bernice arrived in Caesarea to pay a formal visit to Festus.
Context: A new pair of characters enters - Herod Agrippa II (great-grandson of Herod the Great) and his sister Bernice - setting up the dramatic hearing of chapter 26.
Meaning: This is a courtesy visit between political figures, but Luke uses it to bring in a genuinely knowledgeable audience for Paul's next defence - Agrippa actually understood Jewish customs and scripture, unlike the purely Roman Festus.
Lesson: Jesus often arranges unexpected audiences for the truth to be spoken to - people show up in your life, seemingly by coincidence, who are exactly positioned to hear what needs saying. Stay ready to speak when the door opens, even socially.
See Also: 25:23 (their grand entrance to hear Paul, "with great pomp"); 12:1 (this Agrippa's father, Herod Agrippa I, who killed James and imprisoned Peter - showing the family's complicated history with the church).
25:14KJV And when they had been there many days, Festus declared Paul’s cause unto the king, saying, There is a certain man left in bonds by Felix:
B:E Project During their stay, Festus told the king about Paul's case: "There's a man here whom Felix left in prison."
Context: Festus uses the royal visit as an opportunity to get expert input on a case he doesn't fully understand, since it involves Jewish religious matters beyond his competence.
Meaning: Festus's honest admission that he's out of his depth on Jewish religious questions leads directly to the setting up of Paul's greatest recorded speech. What looks like small talk becomes the doorway to chapter 26.
Lesson: Jesus notes that admitting what you don't understand, rather than pretending expertise, is often what opens the way to real answers. Humility about your own limits can lead you exactly where you need to be.
See Also: 24:22 (Felix's earlier, similarly incomplete grasp of "that way"); 26:26 (Paul later notes Agrippa's superior knowledge of these matters).
25:15KJV About whom, when I was at Jerusalem, the chief priests and the elders of the Jews informed me, desiring to have judgment against him.
B:E Project "When I was in Jerusalem, the chief priests and elders brought charges against him and asked me to condemn him."
Context: Festus recaps for Agrippa the events already narrated at the start of the chapter, giving the reader (and Agrippa) the full picture before Paul speaks.
Meaning: The retelling emphasises just how determined and organised the opposition to Paul was - not a spontaneous complaint but a coordinated push by the religious establishment for a legal execution.
Lesson: Jesus notes that persistent, organised opposition to the truth doesn't make the truth wrong - numbers and official standing aren't the same as being right. Don't measure the rightness of your path by how much resistance it draws.
See Also: 25:2-3 (the original accusation and ambush plot Festus is summarising here).
25:16KJV To whom I answered, It is not the manner of the Romans to deliver any man to die, before that he which is accused have the accusers face to face, and have licence to answer for himself concerning the crime laid against him.
B:E Project "I told them it isn't Roman practice to hand over anyone before he has faced his accusers directly and had a chance to defend himself against the charge."
Context: Festus states the Roman principle of due process explicitly - a genuinely fair standard that, ironically, exceeds what the religious leaders were seeking for Paul.
Meaning: This is essentially the ancient world's version of "innocent until proven guilty, with the right to face your accuser" - a real legal safeguard that, however imperfect Rome was in other ways, protected Paul from a stitched-up conviction.
Lesson: Jesus affirms that fair process protects the vulnerable, and that this kind of built-in fairness - giving a person the chance to answer for themselves - is worth valuing and practising in your own dealings with others, even when it's inconvenient. Don't convict people in their absence, in your heart or your speech.
See Also: 25:5 (Festus's earlier statement of the same principle); John 7:51 (Nicodemus makes exactly this same objection: "Doth our law judge any man before it hear him?").
25:17KJV Therefore, when they were come hither, without any delay on the morrow I sat on the judgment seat, and commanded the man to be brought forth.
B:E Project "So when they came here, I wasted no time - the very next day I took my seat on the judgement bench and ordered the man to be brought in."
Context: Festus emphasises his own diligence and speed in handling the case, presenting himself favourably to Agrippa.
Meaning: Festus is keen to show he acted properly and promptly - a governor's reputation depended on being seen as efficient and fair, and he's building his own credibility as he tells the story.
Lesson: Jesus notes that how quickly and fairly you act on someone else's need - rather than delaying or dragging things out - reflects genuine care. Prompt, honest handling of other people's situations is itself a form of love.
See Also: 25:6 (the events being described here).
25:18KJV Against whom when the accusers stood up, they brought none accusation of such things as I supposed:
B:E Project "But when his accusers stood up to speak, they didn't bring any of the charges I expected."
Context: Festus's honest, almost puzzled admission reveals how flimsy the accusations actually were once examined under Roman legal scrutiny.
Meaning: Festus, a Roman used to charges of real crimes - violence, theft, sedition - is genuinely surprised to find the accusations are about religious disagreement, not conventional wrongdoing. This confirms Paul's innocence from an entirely neutral, non-Christian source.
Lesson: Jesus points out that sometimes the clearest evidence in your favour comes from people who have no reason to support you - an unbiased observer noticing the accusations don't add up. Truth often becomes visible simply when someone looks closely and honestly.
See Also: 25:7 (the accusations Festus is referring to here); 23:29 (the earlier Roman commander Lysias reached the identical conclusion - nothing worthy of death or imprisonment).
25:19KJV But had certain questions against him of their own superstition, and of one Jesus, which was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.
B:E Project "Instead they had some disputes with him about their own religion, and about a man named Jesus who had died, whom Paul insists is alive."
Context: Festus, a complete outsider to Jewish faith, summarises the whole conflict in strikingly plain, almost dismissive terms - reducing the resurrection to a strange local dispute.
Meaning: This is a wonderfully honest outsider's-eye view: to a Roman pagan, the entire foundation of Christianity - the resurrection - sounds like a minor religious squabble. Luke lets the reader see how the gospel's central claim looked to someone with zero religious investment in it.
Lesson: Jesus doesn't need everyone to immediately grasp the significance of the resurrection - even genuine truth can sound baffling to someone outside the frame, and that's alright. Don't be discouraged when your deepest convictions sound strange to someone who hasn't yet encountered them.
See Also: 17:32 (Athenian philosophers similarly mocked or were merely curious about the resurrection); 26:8 (Paul directly challenges Agrippa on this very point - why is it incredible that God raises the dead?).
25:20KJV And because I doubted of such manner of questions, I asked him whether he would go to Jerusalem, and there be judged of these matters.
B:E Project "Since I wasn't sure how to judge such questions, I asked him if he was willing to go to Jerusalem to be tried there."
Context: Festus continues his recap, arriving at the moment that triggered Paul's appeal to Caesar.
Meaning: Festus admits his own uncertainty honestly - he genuinely didn't know how to rule on a theological dispute, which is a reasonable position for someone without religious training in that specific tradition.
Lesson: Jesus values honesty about your own limits over false confidence - admitting "I don't know" is often wiser and more trustworthy than pretending certainty you don't have. This kind of humility keeps you from doing harm through overreach.
See Also: 25:9 (Festus's actual proposal to Paul, being recounted here).
25:21KJV But when Paul had appealed to be reserved unto the hearing of Augustus, I commanded him to be kept till I might send him to Caesar.
B:E Project "But Paul appealed to be kept in custody for the emperor's own decision, so I ordered him held until I could send him to Caesar."
Context: Festus explains the current legal status - Paul is now technically in the custody of the emperor himself, pending transport to Rome.
Meaning: "Augustus" here is a title (meaning "the revered one") applied to the reigning emperor, not a name - by this point in history, Nero. Paul's case has now escalated to the very top of the Roman legal system.
Lesson: Jesus shows here how using every legitimate avenue available to you can lead to unexpected doors opening - Paul's appeal, made simply to survive an unjust trap, becomes the means by which he reaches Rome to preach, exactly as promised. Faithful action in the moment can serve a much bigger purpose than you realise.
See Also: 25:11-12 (Paul's actual appeal and its granting); 9:15 (the prophecy that Paul would bear Christ's name before kings and Gentiles).
25:22KJV Then Agrippa said unto Festus, I would also hear the man myself. To morrow, said he, thou shalt hear him.
B:E Project Agrippa said to Festus, "I would like to hear the man myself." "Tomorrow," Festus replied, "you will."
Context: This sets up the dramatic hearing of chapter 26 - Agrippa's genuine curiosity provides Paul with an audience uniquely equipped to understand the Jewish scriptural arguments he will make.
Meaning: Agrippa's interest isn't casual - as someone raised with real knowledge of Jewish law and custom (his family had long ruled parts of Judea), he's the ideal listener for the case Paul is about to make. It's a small line with big narrative consequences.
Lesson: Jesus notices genuine curiosity and rewards it with real answers - when someone sincerely wants to understand, a door opens for them, as it does here for Agrippa. Approaching big questions with honest curiosity, rather than either hostility or indifference, is itself the beginning of wisdom.
See Also: 26:1-3 (Paul directly addresses Agrippa's specific expertise in the next chapter).
25:23KJV And on the morrow, when Agrippa was come, and Bernice, with great pomp, and was entered into the place of hearing, with the chief captains, and principal men of the city, at Festus’ commandment Paul was brought forth.
B:E Project The next day, Agrippa and Bernice arrived with great ceremony and entered the audience hall, accompanied by military commanders and the leading men of the city, and Paul was brought in.
Context: This is a formal state occasion, described with unusual visual detail by Luke - deliberately contrasted with the single, chained prisoner about to speak.
Meaning: Luke paints a vivid, almost theatrical scene: pomp, power, and prestige gathered in one room to hear a man in chains. The contrast is the whole point - worldly grandeur assembling to listen to someone the world has already tried to silence.
Lesson: Jesus reminds you that outward status and ceremony mean nothing next to inward truth and courage - the person in chains here has more real freedom and purpose than anyone else in that glittering room. Don't measure worth by appearances of power.
See Also: 26:32 (the eventual verdict of this grand assembly - that Paul is innocent); Luke 21:12-13 (Jesus foretold his followers would be brought before kings and rulers "for a testimony").
25:24KJV And Festus said, King Agrippa, and all men which are here present with us, ye see this man, about whom all the multitude of the Jews have dealt with me, both at Jerusalem, and also here, crying that he ought not to live any longer.
B:E Project Festus said, "King Agrippa, and everyone here with us, you see this man - the whole Jewish community has petitioned me about him, both in Jerusalem and here, shouting that he shouldn't be allowed to live any longer."
Context: Festus formally opens the hearing, framing the intensity of the opposition Paul faces for Agrippa's benefit.
Meaning: Festus is being accurate about the ferocity of feeling against Paul, even while (as we already know) finding no actual legal case against him - highlighting the gap between mob passion and legal fact.
Lesson: Jesus points out that popular outrage, however loud, is not the same as justice - crowds crying for someone's death have been wrong before, including at his own trial. Learn to separate the volume of public opinion from the truth of a matter.
See Also: 22:22 (the Jerusalem crowd earlier crying "away with such a fellow from the earth"); Luke 23:18 (the crowd crying "Away with this man" at Jesus's own trial).
25:25KJV But when I found that he had committed nothing worthy of death, and that he himself hath appealed to Augustus, I have determined to send him.
B:E Project "But I found that he had done nothing deserving death, and since he has appealed to the emperor himself, I have decided to send him."
Context: Festus states plainly, for the official record and for Agrippa, that he considers Paul legally innocent.
Meaning: This is now the third Roman official (after Lysias and effectively Felix's own inaction) to conclude Paul has committed no capital crime - a consistent pattern of official Roman verdicts contradicting the religious leaders' accusations.
Lesson: Jesus shows that truth tends to surface again and again, through different witnesses, even when the powerful keep trying to bury it. Trust that persistent honesty and a clear conscience will eventually be recognised, even if it takes time.
See Also: 23:29 (Lysias's earlier identical finding); 26:31 (the same conclusion reached again after Paul's speech).
25:26KJV Of whom I have no certain thing to write unto my lord. Wherefore I have brought him forth before you, and specially before thee, O king Agrippa, that, after examination had, I might have somewhat to write.
B:E Project "But I have nothing definite to write to my lord the emperor about him. So I've brought him before you all, especially before you, King Agrippa, so that after this examination I'll have something to put in writing."
Context: Festus explains his practical, almost administrative motive for the hearing - he needs a coherent charge to send along with Paul to Rome.
Meaning: This is refreshingly candid: the whole grand hearing exists because Festus literally doesn't know what crime to write down. It underscores, again, that there is no real charge - just an accusation without content.
Lesson: Jesus notes the irony that an innocent man's fate depends on officials scrambling to invent paperwork that fits - and yet even this awkward, bureaucratic moment becomes the platform for the gospel to be proclaimed to a king. Purpose can emerge from the most unlikely administrative tangles.
See Also: 25:19 (the vague, entirely religious nature of the actual dispute, already noted by Festus).
25:27KJV For it seemeth to me unreasonable to send a prisoner, and not withal to signify the crimes laid against him.
B:E Project "It seems unreasonable to me to send a prisoner to Rome without specifying the charges against him."
Context: This closing line of the chapter sets up chapter 26's hearing as, in effect, Festus's fact-finding exercise, and leaves the reader in suspense for Paul's defence.
Meaning: Festus's closing remark is almost comic in its honesty: the entire elaborate hearing that follows exists to help a Roman governor fill in a form correctly, even though he privately already knows the man is innocent.
Lesson: Jesus shows how even a mundane, procedural problem can become the occasion for something eternally significant - the "reasonable" administrative need for a report becomes the platform for one of the greatest testimonies in the whole book. Nothing is too small a doorway for truth to walk through.
See Also: 26:1 (Agrippa's invitation to Paul to speak, directly following from this administrative need).